Join us as we discuss the very first chapter of the Tao te Ching. This famous passage is essential to Taoist thought and has been greatly discussed in the circles of philosophy and ancient wisdom for ages. Here and now, we attempt to break it down through our lenses... which is somewhat counterintuitive to the passage itself!
Upon seeking to understand the mysteries of the universe, the essence of the supreme universe is already lost. attempting to name, define, or grasp what the cosmos is, pulls us away from flowing through the experience.
Therefore, to truly exist is to embrace and envelop yourself in the mystery. When we let go of the analytical way of thinking, we can develop and enhance our intuition and ability to see without seeing. Sometimes things must be believed in order to be seen
WATCH THE EPISODE BELOW!
EPISODE TRANSCRIPT
Welcome. Today, we begin with the first and most well-known passage of the Tao te Ching—a text both ancient and profound. I’m Mark, here with Adam, as we reflect on Chapter 1 through our personal lens.
“The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao.
The name that can be named is not the eternal name.
The nameless is the beginning of Heaven and Earth.
The named is the mother of ten thousand things.
Ever desireless, one can see the mystery.
Ever desiring, one sees the manifestations.
These two spring from the same source but differ in name—this appears as darkness.
Darkness within darkness, the gate to all mystery.”
This is as classic as it gets. As an introduction to ancient philosophical texts, it’s unparalleled—mysterious and thrilling.
Right from the start, it tells us: the subject we’re discussing is beyond the words we use. The Dao can’t be captured by language. Words point to it, but they’re not it.
Coming from traditions where language is held as absolute—such as literalist forms of Christianity—this message is jarring. Instead of declaring the perfection of every word, the Tao te Ching reminds us: language is symbolic. It gestures toward something deeper.
Compare this to Genesis: “In the beginning was the Word.” But here, the beginning is before the word. The Dao is not something to be grasped or defined. The moment we name it, we separate from it. We trade intuitive knowing for mental analysis.
“The name that can be named is not the eternal name."
As soon as we define something, we pull it into a human framework—already stepping away from the Dao.
The passage also introduces duality: the nameless vs. the named, mystery vs. manifestation, desirelessness vs. desire. These arise from the same source yet diverge in expression. The named gives rise to the “ten thousand things”, a reference to the multiplicity of creation.
“From the one comes two, from two comes three, from three come the ten thousand things."
As we categorize and name, we move further from unity. Yet that desire to know and define is also part of being human. Our pursuit of understanding is natural, but it can lead us away from trust and flow.
This naming process mirrors the structure of our modern world—analytical, compartmentalized, fragmented. We dissect existence into smaller and smaller pieces, believing we can understand by isolating. But now, we're entering an age of synthesis. The quantum age reminds us: there's more than just form. There is formlessness. There is mystery.
“Ever desireless, one can see the mystery. Ever desiring, one sees the manifestations."
Naming something separates it from the whole. Desire, in this context, isn’t just longing—it’s a kind of grasping that limits perception.
In nature, there is no such grasping. Animals and plants don’t analyze their behavior—they simply are. A squirrel doesn't think, “I need to gather nuts.” A bird doesn't reason its way into building a nest. A fish doesn’t contemplate water—it lives within it, unaware of the medium that sustains it.
We humans, however, are constantly naming, defining, seeking understanding—and in that process, we risk losing connection to the whole.
“Darkness within darkness. The gate to all mystery.
This final line invites us deeper. The unknown isn't just vast—it contains more unknown within itself. It’s a layered, infinite mystery. Even the darkness holds deeper darkness.
It’s a profound invitation to surrender into the unknown. Rather than resist what we cannot define, we’re asked to sit with it, to trust it, to explore it. This is a radically different way to begin a sacred text—there are no easy answers here, only paradox and openness.
The Dao isn’t something to master—it’s something to remember. Something to feel. Something to become.
Chapter One makes it clear: this journey will be mysterious, paradoxical, and transformative. The Tao te Ching doesn’t offer control. It offers flow.
We’d love to hear what you think. How do you interpret Chapter One? Share your thoughts in the comments. And if this moved something in you, share it with a friend.
Until next time, keep flowing with the Dao.